User talk:ST47: Difference between revisions
Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
Do you comment on the given evidence in sockpuppet investigations, or is it just CheckUser stuff? I have found quite a bit of evidence for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dallavid]] and another user that may be a sock. [[User:Ayıntaplı|Ayıntaplı]] ([[User talk:Ayıntaplı|talk]]) 23:42, 11 December 2022 (UTC) |
Do you comment on the given evidence in sockpuppet investigations, or is it just CheckUser stuff? I have found quite a bit of evidence for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dallavid]] and another user that may be a sock. [[User:Ayıntaplı|Ayıntaplı]] ([[User talk:Ayıntaplı|talk]]) 23:42, 11 December 2022 (UTC) |
||
:Checkuser comments are based on the technical evidence discovered during the check. Unlikely means that while I can't completely discard the possibility that the accounts are related, there is evidence that they are not connected. [[User:ST47|ST47]] ([[User talk:ST47#top|talk]]) 02:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:54, 12 December 2022
The Signpost: 28 November 2022
- News and notes: English Wikipedia editors: "We don't need no stinking banners"
- In the media: "The most beautiful story on the Internet"
- Disinformation report: Missed and Dissed
- Book review: Writing the Revolution
- Technology report: Galactic dreams, encyclopedic reality
- Essay: The Six Million FP Man
- Tips and tricks: (Wiki)break stuff
- Recent research: Study deems COVID-19 editors smart and cool, questions of clarity and utility for WMF's proposed "Knowledge Integrity Risk Observatory"
- Featured content: A great month for featured articles
- Obituary: A tribute to Michael Gäbler
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
- CommonsComix: Joker's trick
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
- Consensus has been found in an RfC to automatically place RfAs on hold after one week.
- The article creation at scale RfC has been closed.
- An RfC on the banners for the December 2022 fundraising campaign has been closed.
- A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 12, 2022 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
- The proposed decision for the 2021-22 review of the discretionary sanctions system is open.
- The arbitration case Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block has been closed.
- The arbitration case Stephen has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 1 December 2022.
- A motion has modified the procedures for contacting an admin facing Level 2 desysop.
- Tech tip: A single IPv6 connection usually has access to a "subnet" of 18 quintillion IPs. Add
/64
to the end of an IP in Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.
Precious anniversary
Three years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:55, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Question regarding sockpuppetry case
Dear ST47,
Do you comment on the given evidence in sockpuppet investigations, or is it just CheckUser stuff? I have found quite a bit of evidence for Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dallavid and another user that may be a sock. Ayıntaplı (talk) 23:42, 11 December 2022 (UTC)