|
New This Week
Critics & Publications
Archives: A-Z Index
Advanced Search
Upcoming Release Calendar
Awards & Bests By Year
All-Time High Scores
All-Time Low Scores
How Metascores Are Calculated
Discuss Film In Our Forums
Stars indicate the most critically-acclaimed movies.
|
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
Warner Bros.
FILM:
GAMES:
MPAA RATING: PG for scary moments, some creature violence and mild language
Starring
Daniel Radcliffe,
Emma Watson,
Rupert Grint,
Richard Harris,
Maggie Smith,
Kenneth Branagh,
Robbie Coltrane,
and
Alan Rickman
This second installment in the Harry Potter series finds young wizard Harry Potter (Radcliffe) and his friends Ron (Grint) and Hermione (Watson) facing new challenges during their second year at Hogwarts as they try to discover a dark force that is terrorizing the school.
| GENRE(S): |
Fantasy
|
| WRITTEN BY: |
Steven Kloves
J.K. Rowling (novel)
|
| DIRECTED BY: |
Chris Columbus
|
| RELEASE DATE: |
DVD: April 11, 2003
Video: April 11, 2003
Theatrical: November 15, 2002
|
| RUNNING TIME: |
161 minutes, Color |
| ORIGIN: |
USA |
All critic scores are converted to a 100-point scale. If a critic does not indicate a score, we assign a score based on the general impression given by the text of the review. Learn more...
100
Chicago Sun-Times
Roger Ebert
Brimming with invention and new ideas, and its Hogwarts School seems to expand and deepen before our very eyes into a world large enough to conceal unguessable secrets -- What a glorious movie.
90
Dallas Observer
Gregory Weinkauf
It's definitely an enchanting spectacular for Potter fans anxious to ride the Hogwarts Express toward a new year of magic and mischief.
83
Seattle Post-Intelligencer
William Arnold
Best of all, the second Potter movie reunites its adult cast: Harris, Maggie Smith, Robbie Coltrane, John Cleese, Alan Rickman, Julie Walters and others -- a veritable Who's Who of British actors that single-handedly elevates the proceedings out of the kid's movie genre into something special.
83
Entertainment Weekly
Lisa Schwarzbaum
And among the things this ''HP'' does very well indeed is deepen the darker, more frightening atmosphere for audiences of all ages already familiar with the intricacies of the ''Potter'' landscape. (This is as it should be: Harry's story is supposed to get darker.)
80
Wall Street Journal
Joe Morgenstern
Has its flaws, but it's better, as well as darker, than the first. It's also longer, by nine minutes, but hold that protest to the Kidney Foundation; the time flies, albeit in fits and starts, like players on a Quidditch field.
80
Variety
Todd McCarthy
Darker and more dramatic, this account of Harry's troubled second year at Hogwarts may be a bit overlong and unmodulated in pacing, but it possesses a confidence and intermittent flair that begin to give it a life of its own apart of the literary franchise, something the initial picture never achieved.
80
Chicago Reader
J.R. Jones
Columbus beautifully realizes many of Rowling's fantastic conceits -- but for the last hour I was searching for a spell to make the credits appear.
75
Boston Globe
Ty Burr
Moves the franchise even closer to Indiana Jones territory, with bloodcurdling action scenes and a passel of climactic computer-generated slime beasties unparalleled in their potential ability to -- I'm quoting from both book and film here -- '' rip, tear, rend, kill. ''
75
Philadelphia Inquirer
Steven Rea
The Chamber of Secrets -- darker, scarier and somewhat better than "Sorcerer's Stone."
75
ReelViews
James Berardinelli
A fun, fantastic adventure, but, watching it, I had the sense that it could have been even better than it is. I was diverted and entertained, but never truly absorbed.
75
Charlotte Observer
Lawrence Toppman
Plusses and minuses work out about evenly, if you compare the sequel to "Sorcerer's Stone." The three young leads act with more assurance; Radcliffe emerges as a leader, rather than one leg of a triangle. (Too bad he no longer expects to make all seven of the proposed pictures.)
75
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
Rick Groen
There's a missing element whose absence, forgive me, I can't help but lament. This is a movie about magic that ultimately lacks the magic of movies."
70
Village Voice
Ed Park
Chamber's charm lies in the sheer visualization of Rowling's weirder inventions: pots of shrivel-phizzed screaming treelets, Harry's arm gone boneless from a bungled spell, a scolding letter from home that leaps to life as a yapping paper mouth.
70
TV Guide
Frank Lovece
While this is just as long as the first film, more convincing special effects help make time fly.
70
Washington Post
Desson Thomson
Nothing from the book is left to wither away. That should please the vast reading audience that'll watch the movie.
70
LA Weekly
Ella Taylor
Columbus' sequel is faster, livelier and a good deal funnier than his original, due to the presence of some new characters.
67
Austin Chronicle
Kimberley Jones
Columbus never quite captures the depth, the rich complexities of Rowling's novels. She's written four Harry Potter books for kids that adults swoon for, too. Columbus has made two Harry Potter movies for kids … and we'll leave it at that. That isn't bad. But I suspect there's something better just around the bend.
63
New York Post
Lou Lumenick
Screenwriter Steve Kloves still seems overly dedicated to cramming in every detail of J.K. Rowling's novel - while tacking on a schmaltzy Hollywood ending.
63
New York Daily News
Jack Mathews
Chamber is chockablock with action (including a far more exciting game of Quidditch) and crafty special effects.
63
Chicago Tribune
Mark Caro
It remains an expertly assembled companion piece to its source material, with charms you can't overlook. But the great Harry Potter should be casting a more powerful spell.
63
Baltimore Sun
Michael Sragow
Drags on and on and could frighten little kids. But Kenneth Branaugh is one bright light in Chamber of Secrets.
63
San Francisco Chronicle
Mick LaSalle
Scenes that should have been cut are included, so as not to disappoint anyone. What could have been a small, sweet and genuinely scary film is instead a full hour too long and many millions too fat.
63
Miami Herald
Connie Ogle
Doesn't feel quite so lengthy as its predecessor. And while it still falls short of becoming the classic fans so badly want it to be, the film is livelier and better overall than "The Sorcerer's Stone."
60
The New York Times
Dana Stevens
By the end, instead of feeling stirred to a high pitch of anxiety and excitement, you may feel battered and worn down. But not, in the end, too terribly disappointed.
60
The Onion (A.V. Club)
Keith Phipps
A well-chosen cast helps make the wild notions convincing, and director Chris Columbus presents it all in an attractive, thoroughly watchable package. But try imagining a universe in which the Harry Potter series existed only in film form.
60
New York Magazine
Peter Rainer
This time around, Harry Potter has more to worry about than the Dark Arts -- though parts of The Chamber of Secrets are spellbinding, he seems to be suffering from a bit of sequelitis.
60
Los Angeles Times
Kenneth Turan
The film's scary moments are too monstrous and its happy times have too much idiotic beaming, making the film feel like the illegitimate offspring of "Alien" and "The Absent-Minded Professor."
60
Film Threat
Rick Kisonak
May just be the most quintessential Steven Spielberg movie Steven Spielberg never made.
58
Portland Oregonian
Shawn Levy
Not much in the way of captivating magic, but all the expected notes are duly played. Hope springs eternal for the next film in the series, though: Columbus is handing the reins over to Alfonso Cuaron, an actual movie director.
50
Newsweek
David Ansen
Before it degenerates into Indiana Potter and the Chamber of Doom, the movie holds promise -- it hints at why the Harry Potter movies aren’t half as wonderful as they ought to be, why they feel created from the outside in. Magic isn’t made by committee.
50
Salon.com
Stephanie Zacharek
After its deceptively fleet opening 20 minutes or so, Chamber of Secrets settles into a plodding amble, a rickety framework in which many allegedly exciting things happen -- and are forgotten only minutes later.
50
Christian Science Monitor
David Sterritt
It's fun to see the regular gang on hand for new adventures, joined by fresh characters who add touches of novelty and spice. But the secrets in this chamber aren't all that amazing once you get a glimpse of them.
40
Slate
David Edelstein
I can't think of a movie this long that has left me so starved for a movie.
40
Film Threat
Eric Campos
With “Chamber of Secrets,” all we get is a f____ "Scooby Doo" episode. Boo on everyone involved...BOOOOOOOO!
30
Washington Post
Stephen Hunter
Big, dull and empty -- nobody associated with this production appears to have thought hard about storytelling.
 The average user rating for this movie is 4.6 (out of 10) based on 140 User Votes
Note: User votes are NOT included in the Metascore calculation.
Read more user comments...
Discuss this movie in our forums |
|