TPMDC

Gingrich 'Deeply Upset' That Scozzafava Endorsed Democrat After He'd Supported Her

Spread the word. Share this article on Facebook!

Share

Fmr. Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) and NY-23 candidate Dede Scozzafava (R)

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Newt Gingrich, who had previously endorsed moderate Republican Dede Scozzafava in the NY-23 special election, now says he is "deeply upset" about her endorsement of Democrat Bill Owens after she withdrew from the race.

"How could she have accepted all that support?" said Gingrich, also adding: "I'm very, very let down because she told everybody she was a Republican, and she said she was a loyal Republican."

Gingrich had caught a lot of criticism on the right for supporting Scozzafava, and arguing that the Republican Party needs to have room for moderates. Now that Scozzafava has quit the race and endorsed the Democrat, due to campaign by the right to push her out in favor of Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman, Gingrich will certainly have to work hard to undo the damage from his having bet on the wrong horse.

Join the Conversation!

45 comments

Recommend Recommend (2)

November 2, 2009 11:14 AM   

Poor Newt. His feelings are hurt.

The transformation to full-on crazy continues.

Democrats are pretty damn fortunate, in a way. Had they had a credibly opposition, instead of crazy birthers/deathers/baggers, they might have had to, you know, actually do something.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:50 PM    in reply to CT Voter

Hey Newt- Palin's a bitch. Get used to it. She's the new gadfly and destined to be a real pain in the ass for any GOP moderates who are challenged by radicals like Hoffman. Scozzafava's scalp will only encourage her to inject herself in all kinds of races. She loves her celebrity, as long as she doesn't have to answer any "gotcha" questions she doesn't like.
At least he can't shut down the government this time when his feelings are hurt.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 1:31 PM    in reply to jeffgee

Watch the disrespectful things you say about Newt "Lizard" Gingrich: he's my hero, and has taught me how to respond to other people's misfortunes:

I don't feel the least sensitivity to or sympathy for him in his plight.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 2:27 PM    in reply to jeffgee

You describe a plague of locusts.

My conservative friends refuse to answer where they hope to get future voters having spent decade and zillions demonizing the very people they need to earn governing majorities.

Where's the outreach plan? Because more tax cuts are not going to cut it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

jet

user-pic

November 2, 2009 11:16 AM   

Have fun with 'Club For Growth' Newt.

You supported the 'Moral Majority', Lee Atwater and his protege Karl Rove, Ralph Reed and the 'Christian Coalition' and now you get The Club for Growth, Randall Terry, The Minutemen, Redstate, World Net Daily and Dick Armey's adopted Teabaggers.

Good luck with that

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:53 PM    in reply to jet

Palin is Newt's ideological descendant. He was the in-your-face firebrand in the '90s, she's today's firebrand, sniping from her Facebook page and robocalls.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 1:34 PM    in reply to jeffgee

Yeah, but there's a difference:

Newt "Salamander" Gingrich had some connection, however tenuous, with reality.

Palin has gone all the way over to the trailer-trash side of the educational divide.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 2:16 PM    in reply to JNagarya

Yes but Palin and Co. take Newt's ideology and vitriol to their logical ends.

So Newt,
You reap what you sow...
What goes around Comes around...


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 5:45 PM    in reply to _jonny_5_

Oh, I agree that she does. Newt "Gila Monster" Gingrich was all along poison that would pollute the political landscape. And the means to become more prominent than the original poisoner is to be a bigger poisoner. Michelle Bachman anyone?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 11:21 AM   

She endorsed who she believes will be the better representative for NY-23. It just so happens to be the Democrat. The Conservatives are pushing the meta argument to send a message to Washington - how does it help NY-23 to be represented by somebody who doesn't live in the district and knew next to nothing about the issues important to the district when interviewed by the local newspaper editorial board?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 11:24 AM   

????

how would endorsing the candidate from the Conservative Party (NOT a republican) make her any less loyal as a republican than endorsing the candidate from any other party???

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 11:29 AM    in reply to fkaZk0sm0

granted the Conservative Party candidate would likely caucus with the republicans, but he is not a member of the republican party and is not the republican party's candidate in the election. she owes him no loyalties as a republican. indeed she was forced out of the race because of republicans who lack party loyalty.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 11:33 AM    in reply to fkaZk0sm0

Because, in their mind, the Conservative Party's candidate is a REAL Republican, whereas the Republican party's candidate is Nancy's foot soldier.

That's evidenced by her endorsement of Owens. In their mind, that is.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:47 PM    in reply to geofu54

because "real" Republicans show their loyalty to the Republican Party by being members of the Conservative Party instead of the Republican Party.

trust me, i'm not actually confused. i am pointing out how gingrich is confused about what it means to be a "loyal Republican" even though he previously seemed to be one of the few high profile republicans to understand party loyalty.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 1:01 PM    in reply to fkaZk0sm0

No, no, I don't think you are confused. But I don't think Newt is actually confused either. I think he's come to the realization that his concept of "party loyalty" is long dead within the party and, with that realization, is scrambling to cover his sorry arse for his own political survival.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 1:38 PM    in reply to geofu54

Newt "Chameleon" Gingrich has always used the term "party loyalty" to evoke the glassy-eyed mesmerization in the Republican party's lockstep brainwashed sheeple, not because HE was "party loyal".

Newt "Snake" Gingrich himself has always been loyal to whatever means would achieve his ends.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 1:16 PM    in reply to fkaZk0sm0

Great post

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 1:15 PM    in reply to fkaZk0sm0

Amen to that. And of course, the flipside is what kind of loyal Republican endorses a non-republikan candidate (Sara? Fred? Anybody? Beuller?)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 11:29 AM   

Liz Benjamin at the Daily News has a good breakdown of the repercussions of Scozzafava's endorsement on her future political career: http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2009/11/dede-democrat-by-default.html#more

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 11:35 AM   

Is Gingrich not a joke ? Why does anyone think he has a future ? He is not electable - he will not run for any office - he trails a long string of fiascoes behind him ...

The more he talks the better - a living breathing reminder of all the mistakes his party has inflicted on our republic in the last few decades.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 11:45 AM   

You vote for the person best suited for the job, not because of what party he is in.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:35 PM    in reply to hologram5

That is a much too narrow way of looking at it. You have to take into account all the ramifications of the vote. Committee assignments, committee chairmanships, which issues get brought up in hearings, what bills get to floor, and other things are all affected by what party the person you vote for belongs to.

You have to take all of that into consideration when you vote because it affects your life whether you like it or not. Otherwise you could shot yourself in the foot with you vote.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:30 PM   

I guess getting railroaded out of a political party can affect your loyalty to that party. Go figure.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:30 PM   

Why would she support Republicans after primarying her with a hardcore winger that only Palin could love?

This woman is a normal, non-teabagger type. How could she identify with insanity?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:51 PM    in reply to fsudirectory

she was not primaried by hoffman.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:31 PM   

I've got a name you need to study up on there Newt. Georges Jacques Danton. I think you'll find it relevant.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:38 PM   

Shouldn't old newt be lobbing his complaints against republicans bringing in a teabaggingcarpetbagger. A righwingfundie who was an accountant with the Lake Placid Olympics that went bankrupt and had to be bailed out by the Fed.

He doesn't know the issues of the district and didn't even show up for a debate. When attending an editorial board Q&A; he had to bring in Dick Armey because he can't answer the questions the way the right wing wants him too.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:40 PM   

This is a marvelous unravel to behold. Unless you live in the district and may have to endure the tenure of a severe looking bespectacled vision from the 1920's. He not only looks like a scold from that era, he thinks like one.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:47 PM   

Newt is starting to remind me of the mad scientist, watching helplessly as the monster he created destroys the village, all the while protesting that he didn't mean for THIS to happen.

The bottom line is that the crazies are winning on the right. Reasonable people (and it should show you just how far we've come when Newt is considered "reasonable") should get out while they can.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:57 PM    in reply to Bama Belle

Good comment, Bama Belle!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:48 PM   

Seems like she IS a republican and holds republican values above ideology or power.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 12:48 PM   

Good on Dede Scozzafava for putting principle ahead of party. She will be put through the wringer for it by the right and she knows it. She is heroic.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 1:10 PM   

I'm very, very let down because Gingrich told everybody he was married, and he said he was a loyal husband. Newt knows a little bit about betrayal.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 1:54 PM   

Where was the Republican *loyalty* to Dede? Paybacks a bitch

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

TJ1

user-pic

November 2, 2009 1:54 PM   

Let's get this straight - Republicans abandoning a Republican candidate for an Independent party candidate is better than a Republican abandoning an Independent Party candidate for a Democratic candidate?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 1:58 PM   

That Newt can sure pick um...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 1:59 PM   

"How could she have accepted all that support?"

What support? You think your support is a ringing endorsement? You do remember how incredibly unpopular you are with most people, right? And the fact that 'all that support' (besides you) from fellow Republicans went to Hoffman.

"she told everybody she was a Republican, and she said she was a loyal Republican."

Note the past tense. I would question my loyalty too if I were her.

Parties exist for the benefit of their members. Defined, parties are their members. If a party's members won't support other members (and indeed actively campaign on the behalf of someone outside of the party who is directly competing with another member), the party's members are ignoring their responsibility as party members.

Newtie, Scozzafava didn't betray the Republican party. The Republican party betrayed her.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 2:16 PM   

He has every right to be upset. He stuck his neck out for her and she took a lot of GOP cash.

If a Dem did that to me, I'd be extremely upset.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 4:08 PM    in reply to Ward Report

What a minute, a Democrat did do that to me! Joe Lieberman.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 3:00 PM   

Newt and his Republican buddies are just amazing. They are so deeply offended that this woman has endorsed the Democrat. Why shouldn't she? She was vilified by her own party and told, in no uncertain terms, that there was no room in the GOP for anyone that might be a fiscal conservative, but has room in their beliefs for alternative views on social issues.

If you don't goose-step with the "teabaggers" you're not welcome. So she did the only sensible thing. She threw her support to the candidate that welcomed her input.

These people think that they can abuse and humiliate people relentlessly, and then act the wounded party when they defect to the other side.

They may get away with it in this rural district that hasn't sent a Dem. to congress since the Civil War. And apparently they will capture the Governor's race in Va. and quite possibly NJ. And maybe it's for the best. It will embolden them to think that the litmus test is a viable way to run their party,

But winning local elections is one thing. 17% of Americans refer to themselves as Republicans. Let's see how well the hard-right approach works in '10 and '12.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 5:54 PM    in reply to hall

The predictions that the Repbulicans will make gains in 2010 and 2012 fail to ask this central question:

"Who is going to vote for Repbulicans?"

It won't be all those Independents who left that party. Or those who, already Independent, voted for President Obama.

How did the Republicans establish the monopoly on all of the best and strongest psychedelics?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 2, 2009 3:29 PM   

So Newt ends up looking like a gullible horse's ass. Gosh, what a bummer.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 8:00 AM   

Yeah, Newt -- it's not easy being green. But that brings up the real question here: why does a grown man go through life named for an amphibian?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 8:57 AM   

Rush said this yesterday on his show that with Scozzafava dropping out and putting her support behind Owens, the Democrat, she now has hurt all the RINO's in Washington. I heard that if she would have won this seat in NY-23, she was going to switch parties after being sworn in. Reminds me of another RINO that did that... oh yes, Arlen Specter. We don't need anymore RINO's in Washington. Only TRUE CONSERVATIVES!!! RINO's hurt our party more than anything!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

November 3, 2009 9:22 AM   

It's not true.

It's not possible for newt to be "upset". He's a cold,hearted bastard
who left his first wife while she was in the hopital fighting cancer
and was having an affair with his now third wife while still married
to his second wife.

His disdain for women precludes him being "upset" by one.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

PollTracker

More polls »

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on