LawMeme LawMeme Yale Law School  
LawMeme
Search LawMeme [ Advanced Search ]
 
 
 
 
Features: Sherman, Set the Wayback Machine for Scientology
Posted by Ernest Miller on Tuesday, September 24 @ 09:44:08 EDT Digital Millennium Copyright Act
The Wayback Machine (aka Archive.org, The Internet Archive) has, with little fanfare, removed entire domains from its archive in accordance with a request from Scientology's lawyers:
Lawyers for the Church of Scientology contacted the Internet Archive, asserted ownership of materials visible through the Wayback Machine, and those materials have been removed from the Wayback Machine. [email to LawMeme]

The problem is not that the Internet Archive received such a request from the Church of Scientology's lawyers, or even complied with the legal portions of the request, but that the Internet Archive has not taken minimal steps to defend free inquiry and access to information. LawMeme reveals the sordid details...

This current attack by Scientology on freedom of expression appears very similar to what happened to Google back in March 2002, initially reported among other places in Microcontent News (Church v. Google: How the Church of Scientology is forcing Google to censor its critics). The New York Times (reg. req.) has a good summary of the entire controversy on Google vs. Scientology (Google Runs Into Copyright Dispute).

One of the major problems in the Google Affair was that webpages that did not contain any allegedly copyrighted materials were inadvertantly blocked initially. It didn't help that the documents provided by Scientology were deliberately confusing as to their claims. For example, the Church of Scientology wrote in its cease and desist letter:

This particular web site owner has placed our clients' copyrighted works and federally registered trademarks on his web page without the authorization of our clients. According, his actions are in violation of United States copyright law and I request Google either remove or disable access to the web site, "www.xenu.net". [emphasis added]
The homepage of Xenu.net does not contain any copyright violations. None. Therefore, since when does the presence of a trademark mean one has to remove a webpage from search (or archive) results? Microcontent News has more details on this aspect of the Google Affair (Church v Google, round 2).

Of course, it is impossible to know at this time what the claims Scientology's lawyers have made to the Internet Archive. When LawMeme requested for a second time to see any documents provided by Scientology's lawyers, we received this reply:

[IA wishes it could be] more helpful, but at this point, if you need any additional information, you need to ask the Scientologists. [email to LawMeme]
LawMeme didn't bother to waste its time. Of course, in the interests of freedom of speech, a good policy to adopt would be that of Google, which provides the following statement when a search result has been removed:
In response to a complaint we received under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have removed [n] result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read the DMCA complaint for these removed results.
Google then provides the complaint to Chilling Effects. If you are not familiar with Chilling Effects, it is a website sponsored by a number of law schools to publicize and archive cease and desist letters as well as provide information on the protections of the First Amendment and operation of various intellectual property laws. Bookmark it.

So, while Lawmeme doesn't know all the details of Scientology's request to the Internet Archive, especially the extent of websites removed, we do know that the Internet Archive is blocking all archived versions of one of Scientology's leading critics and the main target in the Google Affair, Xenu.net. If you use the Wayback Machine to look for www.xenu.net, you will receive the following message:

Blocked Site Error.

Per the request of the site owner, http://www.xenu.net/ is no longer available in the Wayback Machine. Try another request or click here to see if the page is available, live, on the Web. http://www.xenu.net/ [Searching Page: Xenu.net]

This illustrates the second major problem with the Internet Archive's response to Scientology's lawyers - the Internet Archive is being misleading about the source of the request to remove pages. In an open letter to the Internet Archive, the owner of Xenu.net has made it explicit that he has not requested the removal of his own site as well as providing a good deal of background on the Google Affair (The cult now attacking archive.org - The Wayback Machine). [Aside: I would like to point out that, if Xenu.net does contain copyright violations, then the Internet Archive is risking litigation by continuing to link to the site.]

Solution

The Internet Archive obviously needs a open policy on copyright violations and they have one (Internet Archive's Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Copyright Policy):

Copyright Policy
10 March 2001

The Internet Archive respects the intellectual property rights and other proprietary rights of others. The Internet Archive may, in appropriate circumstances and at its discretion, remove certain content or disable access to content that appears to infringe the copyright or other intellectual property rights of others. If you believe that your copyright has been violated by material available through the Internet Archive, please provide the Internet Archive Copyright Agent with the following information:

Identification of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed;
An exact description of where the material about which you complain is located within the Internet Archive collections;
Your address, telephone number, and email address;
A statement by you that you have a good-faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law;
A statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the owner of the copyright interest involved or are authorized to act on behalf of that owner; and
Your electronic or physical signature.

This policy obviously attempts to parallel the DMCA Safe Harbor Provisions. Unfortunately, as the overreaching lawyers of Scientology have shown, such a policy is not sufficient to safeguard free speech. The Internet Archive should, at a minimum, add the following to its policies:
  • Publish all cease and desist letters and/or provide them to Chilling Effects,
  • Provide a link to this letter when a search results in a blocked page,
  • Provide a page on the Internet Archive website that has a comprehensive list of all such letters and blocked websites,
  • Notify the owners of webpages so blocked,
  • Provide instructions for counter-notification under the DMCA, and
  • Develop a policy to review all such requests and restore the archive of inappropriately blocked sites.

Of course, it always helps if the public makes it known that it values free speech, as this article in Linux Journal makes clear (Google Begins Making DMCA Takedowns Public). Make your voice heard! Email info@archive.org.

The Internet Archive says it well itself:

Open and free access to literature and other writings has long been considered essential to education and to the maintenance of an open society. Public and philanthropic enterprises have supported it through the ages.
Let's hope the Internet Archive will try harder to live up to its own ideals in the face of bullys like Scientology. [via Metafilter]
 
Login
Nickname

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
Related Links
· Archive.org
· Scientology
· Church of Scientology
· Google
· Microcontent News
· Church v. Google: How the Church of Scientology is forcing Google to censor its critics
· New York Times
· Google Runs Into Copyright Dispute
· cease and desist letter
· Church v Google, round 2
· Chilling Effects
· Xenu.net
· http://www.xenu.net/
· Searching Page: Xenu.net
· The cult now attacking archive.org - The Wayback Machine
· Internet Archive's Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Copyright Policy
· DMCA Safe Harbor Provisions
· Linux Journal
· Google Begins Making DMCA Takedowns Public
· info@archive.org
· Scientology
· Metafilter
· More about Digital Millennium Copyright Act
· News by Ernest Miller


Most read story about Digital Millennium Copyright Act:
Analysis of BNETD and Blizzard

Article Rating
Average Score: 4.91
Votes: 35


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent


Options

Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend
"User's Login" | Login/Create an Account | 6 comments
Threshold
  
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: Sherman, Set the Wayback Machine for Scientology (Score: 0)
by Anonymous (Name Withheld on Advice of Counsel) on Tuesday, September 24 @ 16:51:03 EDT
Maybe the DMCA is the problem?


What is lawmeme doing to fight new Fair Use attacks, new drm restrictions, Palladium, and other relevent attacks on open information? (Note on the drm link, just as Clinton harped on the definition of "is", so to does Microsoft harp on "require", instead, "opt-in" will be the standard, and Congress will be the enforcer through law or standards requirements).


What is Yale doing to fight the media and entertainment cartels in their quest to control all content? Or congressional attacks on information and Fair Use? Or getting disconnected from the internet without due process?


Have a problem with the DMCA? The DMCA will pale in comparison to the restrictions Hollywood is attempting to put in effect either through taxes, more taxes, and more taxes, manufacturers, criminal legislation, or getting big IT to cave/realize the $$$ that big IT can make in being restriction partners with the entertainment cartels. Or even low-tech solutions, and conspiracies, even on handhelds?


Publishers angry at selling used books? What happens when books go digital?


Perhaps Yale has one of those contracts with students and faculty that requires any work/discoveries/ideas developed by individuals while attending/working for Yale are required to give up any rights to such work/discoveries/ideas to Yale, and the DMCA/drm would help enforce this?


Where was Yale when NYFairUse and NYLXS members went down to Washington to help defend individuals' rights to information? And pried open the door for everyone for a seat at the table.


Will Yale get involved in the drm fight? Or will Yale continue to sit on the sidelines, leaving the fight to small groups, and another University? (I'll provide link when I find it).


[ Reply to This ]

Re: Sherman, Set the Wayback Machine for Scientology (Score: 2, Interesting)
by Anonymous (Name Withheld on Advice of Counsel) on Tuesday, September 24 @ 19:39:17 EDT
I had blogged about "Sins of Ommission" yesterday... I'm sad to see it coming true... or maybe I knew it was always true: http://the-edge.blogspot.com.


[ Reply to This ]

Re: Sherman, Set the Wayback Machine for Scientology (Score: 0)
by Anonymous (Name Withheld on Advice of Counsel) on Wednesday, September 25 @ 09:29:51 EDT
This is depressing, though I'm not sure exactly what to make of it.

The COS is doing what everyone has come to expect, and good luck trying to get them to stop.

The real issue is the behavior of the Archive. The Archive has a choice-- fight (hire lawyers and deal with a high publicity lawsuit) or flight (comply with COS demands). They could also do your "minimum" jujitsu approach, a la Google.

The Archive's choice depends, I would imagine, on how they are governed and funded. If its policy is to cave when confronted on any archiving issue rather than incur any additional costs, can we blame them for providing a free service that is gunshy and patchy? I would prefer that they at least publish the letter, but ultimately I'm unsure if they have any ethical obligation to do so.


[ Reply to This ]

The Internet Archive is also not reliable, datewise (Score: 1)
by hananc on Wednesday, September 25 @ 16:12:18 EDT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.info.org.il/english/
I wanted to publish a link to information about a nuclear facility located near my home. On the way I found out that an "anti-secrecy" organization has removed information from their site due to "security concerns". I also learnt how the Internet Archive works and found out that it is not reliable, datewise.

Read more about it here.


[ Reply to This ]


Leges humanae nascuntur, vivunt, moriuntur
Human laws are born, live, and die


All stories, comments and submissions copyright their respective posters.
Everything Else Copyright (c) 2002 by the Information Society Project.
This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Open Publication License, v1.0 or later (the latest version is presently available at http://www.opencontent.org/openpub/).

You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php