Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Old Trafford
Manchester United's forthcoming flotation is expected to propel it past Real Madrid to become the world's most valuable football club. Photograph: John Gichigi/Getty
Manchester United's forthcoming flotation is expected to propel it past Real Madrid to become the world's most valuable football club. Photograph: John Gichigi/Getty

Manchester United IPO: share prices cut before US stock market flotation

This article is more than 11 years old
Shares will now be sold at $14, but sale is still expected to make it the most valuable football club in the world

Manchester United has slashed the price of its shares in advance of its debut on the New York Stock Exchange on Friday.

The club had been set to sell its shares for between $16-$20 (£10-£13) a share but cut the price to $14 late on Thursday following negative comments from Wall Street analysts and Facebook's disappointing stock market debut in May.

Even after the cut, United will be valued at $2.3bn (£1.5bn), making it the most valuable football club in the world. Real Madrid, its closest rival in financial terms, is valued at $1.88bn, according to an annual ranking by Forbes magazine.

The shares are being sold by the Glazers, a US family who made their fortune with shopping malls and trailer parks and also own the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

The Glazers bought United in 2005 for about $1,250m (£800m). They are selling 16.7m shares, equal to a 10% stake, and will raise about $330m (£210m). The family will net about $140m from the flotation.

The club claims a global fan base of about 660m and has won a record 19 league titles. Its share sale will be the largest sports listing on record, surpassing World Wrestling Federation's $190m IPO in 1999, according to Thomson Reuters.

It will also be the most high profile since Facebook's ill-fated debut on the Nasdaq stock exchange in May. The social network's much hyped share sale proved a bust and shares initially sold at $38 are now worth $20.

Wall Street analysts have warned they believe United's sale could also be a disappointment. "I'm calling this 'son of Facebook'," said David Menlow, president of the research firm IPOfinancial.com.

He said too little of the money being raised looked like it was going to be invested in the club, the club had too many debts and it wasn't clear how it intended to grow as a business.

"Sports franchises have this emotional flourish, then everybody wakes up and wonders, 'do I really want to own this'," he said.

Sam Hamadeh, founder of New York-based analyst PrivCo, called United "a collectible not an investment". "This is one for the rabid fan," he said.

This is the Glazer family's third attempt at a share sale, having previously scrapped efforts to sell shares on exchanges in Hong Kong and Singapore.

Those sales failed as investors balked at United's proposed dual class share structure. Under the US listing the family will retain control of the club through class B shares that have 10 times more voting power than the publicly-traded class A shares.

The company is also taking advantage of recently-introduced US laws that limit the financial disclosures it must make. United is raising capital as an "emerging growth" company under US president Barack Obama's recently passed Jumpstart Our Business Startups, or Jobs, Act.

The move means United will not be required to file quarterly reports or be subject to the same level of financial scrutiny as other US-listed firms for five years.

Some of the proceeds from the sale are expected to be used to pay down some of the 134-year-old club's debt, which was last reported to be about $661m. But the Glazer family had originally claimed all the proceeds would go towards United's debt, angering some fans.

A leading fan group has called for a boycott of the club's sponsors in protest at the terms of the share sale.

A statement from the Manchester United Supporters Trust read: "The Manchester United Supporters Trust has today called for a worldwide boycott of Manchester United sponsors' products, with support across the UK, Europe, Asia and the US. The boycott strategy is intended to send a loud and clear message to the Glazer family and club sponsors that, without the support and purchasing power of the fans, the global strength of the Manchester United brand doesn't actually exist."

Comments (…)

Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion

Most viewed

Most viewed